Hey there occulties,
While, if I work for you, I am certainly thinking of you, please do not infer that I am writing articles about you or your problems or what we should do in particular. In the last day I have been deluged with "Is this communication article about my case," or similar, and no, it isn't. In fact, people who are just my readers have, at times, missed out on my publishing a particular article because something in a client's case came up, and the subject matter was something that I found to be similar enough that I would get a complaint (despite it not being written about that person.) For example, I had a pretty crazy person about a year ago reverse a payment to me because I didn't reply to her on my day off about a scheduling concern – yes, that's right, not immediately responding that same day about scheduling something meant I'd "abandoned her". So, when that happened, publishing the "get your money returned from someone who owes it to you," article had to not go up, because obviously this person would believe it was about them when it was not (though, unsurprisingly, I did get the money back.)
While I'm all for a pro-active approach to your problems and educating yourself on what spells can do and how they work and all that, please understand, I'm writing for a large audience, many of which have never wanted me to do spellwork for them. While I certainly don't mind questions, and I do understand that some articles might pique curiosity, I am NOT writing about your case, or what I specifically think we should do. 😉 If I did not discuss YOUR CASE with you privately to your satisfaction (which is much more insightful than me writing for a large audience,) kindly let me know. The previous article was in no way to discredit or encourage the use of communication work as much as to clarify that sometimes the desired outcome is better manifested via means other than communication spells.
Hope that clears things up,
~Cat
Leave a comment