Cat’s Rants: Confessions of an Occult Mastermind

Everything you ever wanted to know about Hoodoo, Rootwork, or the Occult! The internet’s longest running occult blog, established 2004

[
[
[

]
]
]

Questions You’ve Asked Me – Contest 2009 edition, part 1

Hello Occulties,

Thanks to everyone who took part in this year’s contest! Without further ado…let’s get to our WINNING QUESTION!!! 🙂

Q: How can one improve their success rate at spellcasting? Are there meditations or mental exercises one can do to improve? Is it something like learning how to play the piano, or are some people just gifted and some are not?

A: I would say spellcasting IS a bit like playing the piano – some people are naturally gifted and get the hang of it easily, quickly, and work strongly with it, while others struggle and need to practice. It helps to determine, if the petitioner can, where your weaknesses lie.

For example, some people have a hard time retaining focus during the ritual, others have a hard time “grounding and centering” the energy, and yet others are hyper-exact about manistations which can create LENGTHY manfestation times (for example, if you wanted a job in a bank that was within 10 miles of your home, this may be easier to manifest than a job as the vice president of this exact bank and this exact address, and the news must be delivered to you on a tuesday,) whilst others then are far too vague (if you want Johnny to love you, well, love doesn’t always come with desire or romance…sometimes its just friends!) and do not get what they want…exactly. 😉

Exercises one might try to help with issues of keeping focused during the ritual can be as simple as just a concentration exercise, or even more complex meditiation techniques. For example, a concentration exercise I might recommend is to try to envision a red number one. Keep this image of the number one, colored red, without any interfering thoughts. When you find you’re thinking of ANYTHING other than that red one, note the time you were able to hold this singular thought in your mind (you may wish to use a stop-watch,) and then move on to an orange number 2, then when you move focus at all from the orange 2, note the time and try to envision a yellow three, then a green four, then a blue five, then a violet six. Repeat this exercise about once a day until you can keep your thought focused on one of those colored numbers for AT LEAST 1 minute. Many people often discover that when they start this exercise, they can barely hold a solid thought for more than a few seconds. 😉 This is normal and to be expected.Lawn leaf

While meditiation by itself is helpful with spellwork and visualization, there are as many methods to learning how to meditiate as there are people in the world. 😉 People ask me how I meditate, and since I often have trouble sitting and meditating (apparently my babyhood issue of drooling re-awakens when I do, and I drool on myself, thus rousing myself from meditiation,) the method I use is to allow my body to begin to slip into sleep while lying down, and then just as I start to feel myself going into a sleep state, I wake my mind without waking my relaxed body. I realize a bunch of you are scratching your heads and telling yourselves that doesn’t make much sense, but its how it works for me. I allow body to relax, and my mind to wander on any subject or thought it would like to wander to. As I begin to drop off, my thinking becomes a bit incoherent (even to me,) and this is when I pull my mind into thinking lucidly, but I do not tell my body to rouse itself along with my brain. 😉 This has proved the best method for me personally, and I’ve actually helped a few people learn to meditate the same way, as I just said “Well, try meditiating before you go to sleep or when you first wake. Especially in the example of waking, your body is already near the proper level of relaxation…” Hey, maybe it sounds funky, but it works for me.

Also, there is a non-religious explaination and how-to on meditiation (if memory serves me right) in the book You Are Psychic! by Pete A. Sanders (a wonderful book with a stupid title that I regularly recommend.) 🙂 I will try to add a few more meditation links in the next day or so (at which point, I’ll delete this sentence you’re reading.) 😉

Basically, like anything else, whether or not you are naturally gifted or have to keep practicing, the key is still regular study and use of spellcraft.

Q: When doing your own rootwork but using another person’s spell, is it best to follow that spell exactly or is it best to do what you’re feeling for the spell?

A: I generally hear this more from neophyte spellcasters than anyone else, and my best answer is… if you are strongly familiar with whatever you’re doing to change the spell (for example, the author recommends you use a Friday in a Venus hour, and you decide to work Friday in a Mercury hour to aid communication; or perhaps if you feel driven to add in some cinammon to a spell, you know the correspondeces with the herb cinammon are going to work with the spell, and you’re prepared to add or eliminate another ingredient in the knowledge that the spell author may be using numerological correspondences with the ingredients; etc,) then its up to you as to whether or not you feel you should alter the spell to your liking.

Quite frankly, I’m all for invention and exploration, but when people seem drawn to “doing what FEELS right,” when it comes to spells, it seems I hear a lot of either oddly slapped together ingredients which the person put together not out of knowing what the herbs did but rather because it was there and they tossed it in (sometimes that works, sometimes it fizzles, sometimes it blows up in your face,) or someone wanted to mess with spirits and beings they are not initiated to play with and end up calling say…Erzulie and Oshun together (oh, and Mama Chola, too, all at once) in the name of “whatever feels right,” and I get some frantic letter with someone telling me some horror story of the outcome of that ridiculousness (don’t mix your spirits like that, kids.) 😉 So…this puts me in a precarious position in answering. Do I think someone should just act stupid because they sort of had an urge one day to do this or that, and, in ignorance, this person went ahead and acted on the urge, thus harming themselves? Well, not at all. I’ve heard way too many “Cat, I effed up stories,” to be a huge fan of the “It just felt right” philosophy. 😉 Purple mushroom

So….try learning to familiarize yourself on basic herblore, planetary and color correspondeces, etc, and when you’ve reached an intermediate to advanced level of knowledge in rootwork, THEN start changing the spells around. If you want to sort of experiment on your own, then use simple candle magic for this when you are still in your beginner stage, and be sure to check your correspondences before casting the spell. 🙂 As you become more and more knowledgable, sure, experiment or test out different ingredients in more advanced spells.

BUT until out of the newbie state, its probably best to stick to another’s directions. I personally use the exact specifications of the author when trying out a new spell, and I hope people feel I’m advanced in my level of spell knowledge.

So, short answer, its best to use someone else’s instructions when doing a spell authored or passed on by that person at least the first time you do the spell, and if you’ve got an urge to alter the spell, you should do so with some caution until you’ve reached at least an intermediate level of knowledge with spellcasting.

Q: In quite a few spells I run across, they almost always state to drop whatever spell remnants are left on the target’s property. Sometimes that’s not always possible (due to logistics, big ass dogs that surround the place or nosy neighbors that tell it all!). What are your feelings on alternative foot trick placements (ie crossroads the targets have to go through daily, etc)?

A: I am definitely proud to be an owner of a big-ass dog for this very reason – j/k! 😉

Perhaps you want them to see what you’re leaving (back in the day if you found rootwork remains and TOUCHED them, you were terrified the evil was upon you,) OR you do put them in a place the person would feasibly pass close by to. For example, if I had wanted to put a curse on someone and not have them know I was involved, I might place the item in an empty lot or field near where the person works or lives, but OFF my property.

If you’re working with just powders (ie tricking through the feet,) you can spread these powders on the ground very easily and have them not apt to be seen – how? Because in all honesty using colored talc is the only thing that gives that away, and is why I make my powders TALC-FREE and uncolored, and recommend that you either make your own powders talc-free and uncolored or find a rootworker who will. Talc is nothing more than a cheap filler, IMHO, that larger supply houses use to spread out the more expensive herbal matter in their powders and powdered herbs can easily be obtained from any herbal supply outlet, like I use Mountain Rose Herbs which sells many roots and herbs in powdered form.

Some traditional powders do have some “colored” elements due to the inclusion of colorful roots or minerals. Hot foot and goofer dust both have red and light yellow elements, but this can be minimized by placing the powder on a lawn or an uneven surface where the person may walk. A deviation of this method is to dress a door knob with powder or oil so that skin contact is made.

BUT if the idea is to leave ritual remains (which could look like trash or something freakier than trash, lol,) where the spell target may come in contact with them, failing the idea that you could get in or on the property without suspicion, hiding these items along a well known route the target travels on (near the home or job, – even in or under the car when its parked off the target’s property,) is perfectly acceptable and can help with the problem of detecting a trick, as the target is not apt to go searching off of their property for a trick someone has laid. HOWEVER, if there is any way you can leave the remains on the intended target’s property, this is stronger than just leaving the remains along a route the person may travel.

IMG_1024 I guess if you can’t get on the target’s property for whatever reason, putting the remains into a tree near where the target will pass, off of the petitioner’s property in some location where they will be apt to walk by or over the remains, by their job (rather than home,) or near or by their car in a lot off their property might be the best recommendations.

Q: What’s the deal with “live things in you?” Are live things in you? Is this a myth?

A: This is an interesting topic for many reasons, but the one I’ve always been the most intrigued by is that there is literally a split amongst rootworkers I know who claim this is a real condition (anyone remember the movie The Believers where Helen Shaver has all those spiders come out of her face? Wasn’t that also the one where Jimmy Smits has a big black snake come out of his gut?) which either is manifested with real live things in you (this is the smallest group,) or that its real in the sense of the spirit of the animal/creature being inside you and/or the spell itself causing Morgellons Syndrome or delusional parasitosis, OR that its just total altogether crap and no such thing is possible through spellwork or any other means.

In my opinion…is this total crap? Like all sorts of spells there are definitely people who have performed bogus acts and called it a spell (some of the Harry Hyatt Hoodoo transcripts include reports made by doctors who coach on how to palm or hide a small insect and then how to let this free and make it look as though it came out of the victim,) but in the same respect, I have also heard more than one report of a curse causing an illness that was neither understood nor explainable by medical science. While the reports I’ve heard directly follow more along the lines of a wasting disease which is incurable, strange rashes, unexplainable fevers, flu-like symptoms, vomiting, and/or outright insanity, I do not discredit that a spell could cause a victim to feel as though bugs, snakes, and assorted crawlies are under their skin. I mean, people can be killed by cursing, so…I’m sure the manifestation of making someone crazy or sick may include giving them the notion that a certain bug is under the flesh.

Also, in an interesting sort of aside here, often the victim has some how consumed a powdered insect or part of an animal, OR has had direct contact with a powder made from a powdered insect, creature or animal, so this lends (in my humble opinion) to the credibility that there are actual spells with the intention of creating the sensation of creatures living under someone’s skin…

But do I personally believe that there are spells made where crawlies come out like the spiders on Helen Shaver’s face in The Believers? No, I don’t think any real spider or snake or scorpion or any other thing literally is inside you. I can conceed that perhaps the spirit or essence of the animal could be placed inside you and cause symptoms that FEEL like the animal is inside you, and I can believe there are spells which make you believe there are things living under your skin…but I am not really…well, open to the idea that an actual scorpion is crawling away under your arm skin or something and you can’t even see it.

So…I would say its accurate that its possible to make a person feel like and believe that they have any nature of bug or crawly under their skin by using a curse. I can believe that a spell and not a medical cure will be needed to stop this sensation… But I am not really strong in believing that an actual living crawly item is under the skin in the sense that a full-bodied snake is swimming around in your gut or something. I also can agree that maybe you could like use scorpions to kill someone and they would come out of that person’s mouth or something after you discover the body…but I think the animal would have entered the body after it died and not before.

That means, while its not a MYTH, its perhaps a misunderstood concept in the world of spellcraft.

Alrightey, kids, that’s part one with my four winners! 🙂 Next up I’ll be posting the questions which all deserve HONORABLE MENTIONS!! Keep your eyes open and peeled for it as I hope to have it up before the end of this week!

~Cat

All text and pictures copyright 2009 OriginalNinjaCat.com, all rights reserved. The questions in this article were askd by person’s other than the author of this article and may have been edited to make sense in the context which they are presented here. This article and all of its contents may not be copied, pasted or in any other way reproduced without the author’s express written permission.

What happens if you steal, copy, plagiarize or in some way infringe on my copyright? Click here to find out!

6 responses

  1. Karma Zain Avatar
    Karma Zain

    I respectfully but strongly disagree that talc is cheap filler and that pure herbs are better. We’re talking about traditional hoodoo powders, not personal preference. Actually, talc is a mineral, and there is a long African-derived tradition of many “old school” powders having a mineral ingredient (including, as you hint, goofer dust and hot foot powder). I believe the inclusion of talc is in alignment with the inclusion of clay in many very old formulae, on those lines – there is a reason besides “filler.” (One of the reasons is that a base powder gives essential oils a much more long-lasting base onto which to bind than pure herbs would be, thereby allowing sachet powders to stay potent longer in a pre-mixed condition – essential oils are critical ingredients in most powders, just as if not more important than the trace amounts of herbal matter itself in sachet powders. (Obv. Love Me powder and Hot Foot powder are not in the same category on that count.)
    Furthermore, there is a long tradition, once pharmacy and mail-order options became more widely available, of dual cosmetic/spellcraft items. Sachet powders fall into this category, as do certain hair ointments, tinned balms and liniments, and aftershaves. Sachet powders are sachet powders because they can be worn safely on the skin and blown into the air to be dispersed. Ignoring the talcum base means ignoring the cosmetic side, and that is a tradition much older than me and you put together.
    Now, I personally don’t use talc because I have health reasons not to. But my powders absolutely do have a non-herbal base — they absolutely are not pure herb — because I make hoodoo powders, and there are many reasons for hoodoo powders to have a non-herbal base. Talcum is not just cheap filler in hoodoo – there is a reason for it, and more than one. Some powders use bases other than talc (sometimes the base is just local dirt, if you want to disguise your goofer dust on your enemy’s step) and there is a reason for that too, as you hint at.
    Hoodoo powders weren’t created to burn on candles and charcoal, and they weren’t created to make potpourri with – they were created to safely, discreetly, and non-oilily get certain key ingredients in contact with a certain target or target, be that target the person wearing a Love Me powder or a neighbor who needs to walk in Hot Foot powder. And they were created to be able to deploy by blowing into the air.
    The upside of my non-talcum base is that you can still blow it into the air and sprinkle it, and it works much better for drawing shapes on altars than talcum powder does.
    The downside is that it is heavier and grittier than a cosmetic, and very very many of my customers and clients are women of a certain age who are accustomed to using talc for things, because it’s been done for generations. They call me really really flustered sometimes when my powders don’t act like they’re supposed to act.
    This is one of those areas that is changing as the uses of powder change in our culture, particularly among women, and more people now have access to the herbs they’d need to make their own powders. It’s now possible for anybody to make their own. But this is a fairly new development, and it’s changing things. So a pure herbal powder made at home is actually a stunning innovation. A talcum-based sachet powder is deeply traditional.

    Like

    Reply
  2. Cat Avatar
    Cat

    Well, I respectfully still say its a cheap filler…and won’t be moved on the point. 😉 Whether it started as a filler or because it has also been used by some as a cosmetic item (if you find my other arguments on this, you will locate in a few places where I reference the origins of supply house and drugstores,) is not so much my point. I’ve said in the past even that its been going on probably for over 100 years that people use talc. I think you and I could add an additional us on there and still have room left over for how long its been going on since we’re about the same age. 😉
    This isn’t to say I don’t see your point, value your input, and am VERY VERY happy that someone at the least has brought for the first time a reasonable argument to the table. 😉 Normally its “But it is cheaper, and it blows better, so there.” (I’ve heard even less reasonable arguments, but that’s the common one.) So, before I move on… I THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU for NOT just to throwing a hissy fit at me for my opinion on powders, and actually doing me the favor of bringing a valid argument as to why talc is an ingredient of worth or historical merit. I am entirely sincere there. I like intelligent disagreements, and its nice for a change to have someone bring one to me.
    So, allow me to defend my stance of severely anti-talc-ness (is that even a word?)…
    First and foremost I obviously cannot argue that the inclusion of talc in many items (magical or no) as a cosmetic ingredient has been around for a long time because I know it has, although the forms I most oft saw it in were dusting a baby’s rear end, or embedded in things such as pressed powders or eyeshadows etc as one ingredient of many. Still, yep, its been there as a cosmetic ingredient… But it should be mentioned that I first became aware that people sometimes use talc on their crotch to stop them from “sticking to their pants” (as it was put to me,) when I was almost 20 and saw it for the first time. Since I am from that frozen tundra known as New Hampshire, this concept was alien to me for the first 2/3 of my life. I can’t recall a Gold Bond, a Johnson’s Baby Powder, a Shower to Shower powder (or any non-brand name talcum) within the homes of any friend or family member who did not have a diaper-wearer in it prior to then. While that may be just selective memory, I was the kid who went and looked in your bathroom cabinets and was that kid til probably I went to college at almost 19. Speaking of friends now, I haven’t gone through another’s bathroom since I was about 19, but most personal products are on the upstairs bathroom counter in friend’s houses and I haven’t seen it there either (though I have seen some friend’s…very personal items out on their counters…and no I don’t mean girlie products…more like…intimate things of a lubrical nature,) so, while I may be putting on airs and speaking out my ass, I’m going to just guess the use of talc is not common in my area for dusting. Why? Is it that northerner’s don’t sweat? Hell, I’ve got enough of a Scottish heritige to say I sweat so much that Noah would be building an ark under my armpit if antiperspirant was never created. I sweat when its cold. Of course we sweat. 😉 BUT, that aside, its just not common to dust shoes or chests or arms or body areas here where I live. This is likely one root of my problem with talcum in general. Its not that its alien to me, its just not a common product, and I would not be surprised to find several others in my area where the same would and could be said.
    But there you go – Hoodoo was born in the south. 😉 So, on that you may have me aced because I can’t argue that southerners of yore used it very often and maybe still do. I remember the shock of watching a guy pull his elastic waist boxers away from his belly in a crowded dorm and puff powder down there while we all asked what in the eff he was doing.
    So, in that, the use of talcum as a dusting powder to help with stickiness/sweat is of course unfamiliar to me due to my geographical location and its traditions. I also know that there seems to be a strong link between ovarian and testicular cancers with people who dust their crotches with talc, so this is a further reason for me to dismiss the use of it in powders today. As for clay, as I was taught regarding the clays of my sculpture years that unfired dry clay can create a dust which never leaves the lung (not all clays, but for the sake of argument, I don’t know which past that its not green clay,) so while I do know of the use of clays in powders and potions of yore, there is not a lot of good river clay here for me to gather nor would I ever have felt right using it for my reasons stated above. In that, you may also have me aced. A good rootworker would use the natural things around him or her as much as possible. I am northern, and therefore many ingredients I use today are ingredients I need to order rather than locate, but this does not mean that if you look at some of my formulary you would not notice that it has a distinctly New England side with a few of the ingredients. My teachings would therefore also reflect a northern flavor.
    Now, I am getting somewhere. 😉 So, while I agree that dirt and river-clay is very much a classic powder ingredient, I still say…talcum is a later inclusion, and one that I feel does not fit anymore. I feel it is often used by people as nothing more than cheap filler (let’s be honest with ourselves, as I know supply houses which are even considered good and trustworthy who do not have any scent, oil, or even an herb if you sift through the mix,) and if they want to give me an argument as well-thought and solid as the one you have just given me, then I might actually respect the use of talc more than I do.
    I had known, 5 or 6 years ago, an incredibly kick-ass root lady in her middle years who used cornstarch in place of the talc for the reason she could color the cornstarch and avoid the cancer-link of talc. Her theory was one borne of wanting to use a colored powder of similar lightness and not anything to do with clay or talc as a cosmetic. I have found several rootworkers (and very RESPECTABLE rootworkers of varied ATR traditions) who have told me similarly that talc is there to properly COLOR the powder. :S Now, maybe its just me and my damn yankee self here, but since when did I want a dark purple streak on my bosom or staining orange-red on my throat or that odd green streak on my resume as is common to happen with particular powders? Many of the colored ones stain or are obvious – at least those I’ve seen. How is that cosmetically solid? How is that quiet and private?
    So, let’s dismiss the use of colored talc on that. I can’t honestly believe that putting a giant colored streak on your body or on a document or on anything was being uber secretive. If you don’t want to agree with me there, don’t. I don’t care. The colored talc was a bad idea.
    BUT, that doesn’t negate the use of talc by itself, does it? I mean talcum powder, in its pure undyed form, is relatively secret. Its light, fine, and blends well. The next argument brought to me was that talc provided a good base for BLOWING the powder. This argument is a good one, and is, to some degree, the most solid I’d heard for some time…however, as you’d mentioned, dirts were a big ingredient traditionally, and dust can also be blown well. Or, I was also told that talc is the mineral replacement to rice powder, which was also used to make a powder able to be blown.
    Then there is the “wearing” of powder. Dust, rice powder, and talc in their au naturel (undyed) forms can be worn, but see that’s where things get foggy for your old pal Cat.
    When I was taught of powders I was told that “back in the day” the way to powder particular items was to burn them into an ash. While I think we can both agree this practice has been recorded (I would have to look after I’m done posting but will try to find a link to a particular text of the late 19th/early 20th century recording this practice,) I am also big enough to conceed that perhaps I was mis-taught to believe this was one of the original method of making a powder with particular herbs it would be hard if not impossible to powder. Burning to ash is also how I was told certain personal ingredients (hair, fingernails, etc,) could be added. I did have some interesting formulae brought to me that included ingredients which, depending on the formula, I have since altered, which were items suchas dust from a foot track, or court dirt, or church dirt. Depending on the formula, I may have omitted or kept this (or may advise someone to add this to a powder I make as obviously if the foot track is 2000 miles from me and 2 miles from you, you can get the foot track, lol.) Talc, however, was not common as an ingredient. Coloring anything was not at all in any original formula I had learned from the source/s I value most. Again, perhaps this is all due to my opinion, background or perception, but it gives some in that it was formulae pre-dating me, so I might draw conclusions that it was how things are done. So far as I was taught, the TRADITIONAL formulae of powders (pre-dating pharmacy-era,) were ashes and dirts and things which we can both agree have been powdered for years either because that was their natural form (suchas with salts, though many salts are ground, too,) or because they were sold as such (for example, pepper.) I was also taught that a pepper mill and coffee grinder could be employed to grind herbs, so…frankly, I don’t think its far fetched to believe some of our fore-rootworkers utilized pepper mills and coffee grinders. 😉 I agree they visited apothecaries, hardware stores, pharmacies, and the general store…even using ingredients that we could not find today (is it copper nitrate? The uber toxic bluing?) in their formula.
    So, I mean, which pre-dates which? Was COLORED talc-base common before they days of mail order and pharmacy suppliers? Could I not argue that COLORED talc has no place traditionally, and that, even if a practice outdates me or you or even my mother or her mother, that its still not one that is disagreeable to me and one which was pre-dated by a practice which did not use unnaturally colored powders? Can I not argue that talc bought from where-ever-the-hell is not as strong as pure herbal powders? Even if the finely ground herbal powder is new, is it not stronger? I feel it is.
    And so if we stick a pin into colored powder use as being more modern, can I then not say that our fore-rootworkers still used other items such as clay gathered from a certain place in the river, or perhaps dirt from a certain area, or ash of a certain thing rather than talc? While it may have the basis in some tradition, could I not argue that earlier Hoodoos did not use talc? Is the talc gathered from a specific talc mine? I mean…if its based on the use of clays and dirts, those clays and dirts are gathered from specific areas…so…where does one gather talc of a similar bend? Seems to me the addition of talc, then, was a later invention to make it either a cosmetic (as you mentioned,) or because its a lot easier to order a bulk amount of talc, add some oil (and hopefully herbal matter,) than it is to gather dirts appropriately. While one tradition may pre-date me, another tradition may pre-date that tradition. Further, while something may have basis in a tradition, that does not mean its not used as a filler (or as the entire powder) by more than one supply house today.
    I mean, you CAN wear a dirt or dust or an ash as a powder without smelling like dirt or looking like crap. I don’t know as I’d call it cosmetic, per se, but it can be used as a dusting on the self.
    Also, I don’t use my powders as an incense. I’ve given recipies that COULD BE USED as incense and anointing herbs on a candle, but my incense includes fine wood-shavings and salt-peter. That I don’t give everyone that formula when offering spells does not mean that’s not how I do it. 😉 I see how one could draw the conclusion, but to let you know, Miss Cat does know how to make the self-lighting stuff (though I use too much salt-peter.) 😉
    In conclusion (sorry about being so long-winded) this is why I feel talc is nothing more than a cheap filler. If we have the technology to omit it, then why not omit it? If we want to be uber-super-traditional, why not go back to the days when we didn’t use talc at all? Perhaps you’re right that this is more of my personal preference and my own prejudices. I’m big enough to admit to that, even if I’m willing to make a huge argument against talc here. Maybe I should STFU, but judging from the length of my reply to you, that’s not likely that I will at any time in the forseeable future be doing so. 😉 To me, I could add a ritual oil to talc and dust myself, but this does not make for a really kickass powder. That some people prefer it that way is fine, and I suspect they are relieved not to use my product. 😉
    That being said, if any other rooties want to come in here and give me arguments over a few paragraphs which basically say to use au naturel powders to disguise them, in a paragraph which was not about the historical nature of talc or colored talc, or really so much about using powders – though did include my prejudice AGAINST the use of them and my feelings that talc is a cheap filler, please do not bother. This was about leaving ritual items somewhere, not ritual powder and its history. I can respect Karma for defending the use of talc and discussing its background and roots in tradition, but I believe the defense on both sides has been heard, and it has little to do with the article or question being answered. I believe its best to leave it at what has been stated by us both.
    That being said, I will remove the “pure herb” reference to you Karma, and sorry for any trouble I may have caused in wrongly implying that this was your method of powder creation. 🙂 Also, one more thanks for a totally kickass valid argument and not just throwing obscenties and emotional dramas at me for saying something you didn’t agree with. As always, you rock and I sincerely think you are perhaps one of the most awesome rootworkers alive today. 😀
    ~Cat

    Like

    Reply
  3. Karma Zain Avatar
    Karma Zain

    More here 🙂
    http://karmazain.livejournal.com/64473.html

    Like

    Reply
  4. Cat Avatar
    Cat

    You even made me sorta kinda admit to being wrong in the slightest of ways but not totally. 😉

    Like

    Reply
  5. Anjanette Avatar
    Anjanette

    What if the target lives in another country and the spell requires leaving some remnants to their property. Can the spell work with its energies alone?

    Like

    Reply
  6. Cat Avatar
    Cat

    I guess that depends on the spell/charm being worked. I can’t really say without more information. Sorry. :S

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to Cat Cancel reply